Starmer Abolishes NHS England to Centralise Healthcare

LONDON, United Kingdom - 14 March 2025

In a significant restructuring of the United Kingdom's healthcare system, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced the abolition of NHS England, aiming to reduce bureaucracy and enhance ministerial oversight of the National Health Service (NHS). This move reverses the 2012 reorganisation implemented by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition, which had established NHS England as an arm's-length body to oversee the health service. ​

The primary goal of this reform is to bring the NHS back under direct ministerial control, thereby increasing accountability and expediting decision-making processes. Health Secretary Wes Streeting described the initiative as a means to eliminate inefficiencies and bureaucratic obstacles that have hindered the health service's performance. The government anticipates that this restructuring will free up funds and accelerate improvements within the NHS, including efforts to reduce waiting times. ​

The reorganisation is projected to result in substantial job reductions across various NHS administrative bodies. Estimates suggest that between 20,000 to 30,000 positions could be eliminated, affecting staff within NHS England, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), and the 42 integrated care boards (ICBs) that oversee NHS trusts. Sir Jim Mackey, the incoming chief executive of NHS England, has mandated a 50% reduction in ICBs' operating costs by the end of the year, potentially leading to approximately 12,500 job cuts. Additionally, Mackey has directed the 220 NHS trusts to reduce corporate service staff in areas such as human resources and finance, contributing to further job losses. These measures aim to address a predicted £6.6 billion overspend in the 2025-26 fiscal year. ​

The announcement has elicited mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Unions have expressed apprehension regarding the potential impact on employee morale and the consequences of sudden job losses. Critics caution that the reorganisation could serve as a distraction from immediate priorities, such as addressing patient care and reducing waiting times. Conversely, some observers support the abolition of NHS England, arguing that it could reduce service duplication and enhance accountability. However, there are concerns that this move may lead to unrealistic funding promises and further challenges within the NHS. ​

The dissolution of NHS England marks the end of a nearly 12-year experiment in managing the NHS with greater independence from ministers. This decision raises questions about the future structure and governance of the NHS, as specific details regarding the replacement of NHS England's functions have yet to be clarified. The success of this high-risk strategy will depend on the government's ability to implement the reforms effectively without disrupting the delivery of healthcare services.

Image: Number 10/Flickr

Licence.